Midrasz do Samuela II 21:8

(Deut. 21:10:) WHEN YOU GO OUT TO WAR <AGAINST YOUR ENEMIES, AND THE LORD YOUR GOD GIVES THEM INTO YOUR HAND> AND YOU TAKE THEM CAPTIVE. Our masters have taught (Avot 4:2): <ONE> GOOD DEED BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED, AND <ONE> TRANSGRESSION BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> TRANSGRESSION. (Deut. 21:11–12:) AND WHEN YOU SEE AMONG THE CAPTIVES A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN <WHOM YOU DESIRE TO TAKE FOR A WIFE, YOU SHALL BRING HER INTO YOUR HOUSE, > WHERE SHE SHALL SHAVE HER HEAD, so that she will not find favor in his eyes.¹Tanh., Deut. 6:1; see Deut. R. 6:4. What is written after that (in vs. 15):) WHEN A MAN HAS TWO WIVES. Two wives in <one> house <means> strife in the house. And moreover (ibid., cont.:) ONE LOVED AND THE OTHER HATED, or both of them hated. What is written after that (in vs. 18)? IF ONE HAS A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. Whenever anyone marries a pretty face, there results from it A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. Thus we find it so in the case of David, because (as suggested by II Sam. 3:3) he had lusted for Maacah bat Talmai king of Geshur, while he had gone to war.²By having sexual relations while at war with Saul (II Sam. 3:1), David was disobeying the Mosaic law of warfare. See Deut. 20:7–8. So Absalom came out of him <in this union>, who wanted to kill him and (according to II Sam. 16:22) slept with his wives before the eyes of all Israel and in broad daylight. Also because of him several myriads from Israel were killed. So he made discord in Israel. Also killed were Shimei [ben Gera] (in I Kings 2:46), Sheba ben Bichri (in II Sam. 20:22), Ahithophel (in II Sam. 17:23), Mephibosheth,³There seems to be some confusion between Mephibosheth who was a son of Saul that David had killed (in II Sam. 21:8) and the Mephibosheth who was Saul’s grandson and who was falsely accused of betraying David for Absalom (II Sam. 16:3; but cf. 19:24–30). and Ishbosheth (in II Sam. 4:7). Moreover <David> had Ziba rule over the whole house of Saul (II Sam. 16:4; cf. II Sam. 9:9). It is also taught: R. Jose says:⁴Sanh. 72a. Is it because A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON ate half a pound⁵Gk.: litra. of meat and drank half a log of wine that Torah says for one to go out to the place for <execution by> stoning (cf. Deut. 21:18–21)? It is simply that Torah has foreseen the end of A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON, that he ends up squandering his father's assets with wastrels with whom he eats and drinks, until he seeks what he has been accustomed to and does not find it.⁶Cf. Luke 15:14–16. Then he goes out to the crossroads, where he kills people and robs⁷Melastem, from the Gk.: lestes (“robber”). them. So Torah is saying: Let him die innocent and not die guilty, for the death of the wicked is fitting for them and fitting for the world. And what is written after that (in vs. 22)? AND WHEN SOMEONE IS GUILTY OF A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY DEATH AND IS PUT TO DEATH. If he is delivered from the one,⁸I.e., the preventive punishment as A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. he is not delivered from the other. We have learned (in Avot 4:2): THAT <ONE> TRANSGRESSION BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> TRANSGRESSION; <ONE> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT.⁹In the text of Avot the clauses are reversed. For the correct order, see the beginning of the paragraph. Note also that the word for GOOD DEED (mitswah) also means COMMANDMENT and that the midrash has both meanings in mind. Where is it shown (in Scripture)? Where it is stated (in Deut. 22:6–7): WHEN YOU COME ACROSS A BIRD NEST…. YOU MUST SURELY LET <THE MOTHER> GO …, IN ORDER THAT IT MAY BE WELL WITH YOU AND YOU MAY LENGTHEN YOUR LIFE. What is written after that (in vs. 8)? [WHEN YOU BUILD A NEW HOUSE, <YOU SHALL MAKE A PARAPET FOR YOUR ROOF>.] You have the right to build a house and make a parapet. What is written after that (in vs. 9)? YOU SHALL NOT SOW YOUR VINEYARD WITH TWO KINDS OF SEED. You do have a right to <possess> a vineyard and to sow a field. What is written after that (in vs. 10)? YOU SHALL NOT PLOW WITH AN OX AND AN ASS <TOGETHER>. You do have a right to <possess> oxen and asses. What is written after that (in vs. 11)? YOU SHALL NOT WEAR INTERWOVEN STUFF, <WOOL AND FLAX TOGETHER>. You do have the right to nice clothes of wool and of linen (but not in combination). What is written after that (in vs. 12)? YOU SHALL MAKE YOURSELVES TASSELS. You have a right to the commandment on tassels. What is written after that (in vs. 13)? WHEN A MAN TAKES A WIFE. A man has a right to a wife and children. We learn (in Avot 4:2): THAT <ONE> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT; therefore the parashot are dependent on each other.

(Deut. 21:10:) “When you go out to war [against your enemies, and the Lord your God gives them into your hand and you take them captive].” Our masters have taught (Avot 4:2), “[One] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment, and [one] transgression brings about [another] transgression.” (Deut. 21:11-12:) “And when you see among the captives a woman of pretty form [whom you desire to take for a wife. And you shall bring her into your house,] where she shall shave her head and do her nails,” so that she will not find favor in his eyes.¹See Deut. R. 6:4. What is written after that (in vs. 15), “When a man has two wives.” Two [wives] in [one] house [means] strife in the house. And moreover (ibid., cont.) “one loved and the other hated,” or both of them hated. What is written after that (in vs. 18)? “If one has a defiant and rebellious son.” Whenever anyone marries a “woman of pretty form,” there results from it a defiant and rebellious son. Thus we find it so in the case of David, because (as suggested by II Sam. 3:3) he had desired Maacah bat Talmai king of Geshur, while he had gone to war; so Absalom came out of him [in this union. The latter] wanted to kill him and (according to II Sam. 16:22) slept with his ten concubines before the eyes of all Israel and in broad daylight. Also because of him several myriads from Israel were killed. And he created discord in Israel, [through which] were killed Shimei ben Gera (in I Kings 2:46), Sheba ben Bichri (in II Sam. 20:22), Ahithophel (in II Sam. 17:23). And he killed Mephibosheth,²There may be some confusion between Mephibosheth who was a son of Saul that David had killed (in II Sam. 21:8) and the Mephibosheth who was Saul’s grandson and who was falsely accused of betraying David for Absalom (II Sam. 16:3; but cf. 19:24–30). and had Ziba rule over the whole house of Saul (II Sam. 16:4; cf. II Sam. 9:9). It is taught: R. Jose says,³Sanh. 72a. “Is it because a defiant and rebellious son ate half a pound⁴Gk.: litra. of meat and drank half a log of undiluted wine that the Torah says for him to go out to the court and be [executed by] stoning (cf. Deut. 21:18-21)? It is simply that Torah has foreseen the end of the thinking of a defiant and rebellious son. As in the end he will squander his father's assets with wastrels with whom he eats and drinks, until he seeks what he has been accustomed to and does not find it. Then he goes out to the crossroads, where he kills people and robs⁵Melastem, from the Gk.: lestes (“robber”). them. So the Torah is saying, ‘Let him die innocent and not die guilty,’ for the death of the wicked benefits them and benefits the world.” And what is written after that (in vs. 22)? “And when someone is guilty of a crime punishable by death and is put to death.” If he is delivered from the one,⁶I.e., the preventive punishment as A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. he is not delivered from the other. [Hence] we have learned “[One] transgression brings about [another] transgression.” [But that one] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment,⁷In the text of Avot the clauses are reversed. For the correct order, see the beginning of the paragraph. Note also that the word for GOOD DEED (mitswah) also means COMMANDMENT and that the midrash has both meanings in mind. where is it shown (in Scripture)? Where it is stated (in Deut. 22:6-7), “When you come across a bird nest…. You must surely let [the mother] go …, in order that it may be well with you and you may lengthen your life.” What is written after that (in vs. 8)? “When you build a new house, [you shall make a parapet for your roof].]” You will merit to build a house and make a parapet. What is written after that (in vs. 9)? “You shall not sow your vineyard with two kinds of seed.” You will merit to [possess] a vineyard and to sow a field. What is written after that (in vs. 10)? “You shall not plow with an ox and an ass [together].” You will merit to [possess] oxen and asses. What is written after that (in vs. 11)? “You shall not wear interwoven stuff, [wool and flax together].” You will merit to [possess] nice clothes of wool and of linen. What is written after that (in vs. 12)? “You shall make yourselves tassels.” You shall merit the commandment of tassels. What is written after that (in vs. 13)? “When a man takes a wife.” You shsll merit to [have] a wife and children. Behold, we have learned that [one] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment and one] transgression brings about [another] transgression. Therefore these sections of the Torah are adjacent to one another.

The disciples of R. Jose questioned him: "How did David marry two sisters while they were both living?" He answered them: "He married Michal after the death of Merab." And R. Jose said so in accordance with his own theory, for we are taught in a Baraitha: R. Jose used to lecture about the following two confused passages: It is written (II Sam. 21, 8) And the king took the two sons of Rizpah, the daughters of Ayah, whom she had born unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal, the daughler of Saul, whom she had borne to Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Mehollathite. But was Michal given to Adriel? Was she not given to Palti b. Layish? as it is written (Ib. 25, 44) But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Palti, the son of Layish. Hence the Scriptures equalize the betrothing of Merab to Adriel to the betrothing of Michal to Palti b. Layish. Just as the betrothing of Michal to Palti was a sin because she was already the wife of David, so also was the betrothing of Herab to Adriel a sin because she was already David's wife. But what would R. Joshua b. Karcha say to the passage which reads: The five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul? Did then, Michal hear them? Was it not Merab who bore them? R. Joshua will answer that Merab bore them and Michal merely brought them up, and therefore they bore the name of Michal. This is to teach you that the one who brings up an orphan is considered by Scriptures as if he bore the child. R. Chanina says: "This is inferred from (Ruth 4, 17) There hath been a son born unto Naomi, etc. Did, then, Naomi bear him? Was it not, in fact, Ruth who bore him? Therefore we must say that, though Ruth bore him, he was nevertheless brought up by Naomi, and therefore is he called after her." R. Jochanan said: "From the following (I Chr. 4, 18) And his wife the Jewess bore Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father, etc., and these are the sons of Bithiah, the daughter of Pharaoh, whom Mered had taken [for wife]. Mered refers to Caleb, and why was he called Mered (rebel)? Because he rebelled against the accusation of the spies. And was he then born of Bithiah? Behold he was born of Jochcbed? We must therefore say that, though he was born of Jochebed, he was nevertheless raised by Bithiah, and therefore he is called after her name." R. Eliezer said: From the following (Ps. 77, 16) Thou hast with Thine arm redeemed Thy people, the sons of Jacob and Joseph. Selah, Were they, then, born to Joseph, and not to Jacob? They were born to Jacob, but Joseph fed them, and therefore they were named after him.

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

(II Sam. 21, 8) And the king took the two sons of Riz-Pah the daughter of Ayah, whom she had born unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she had brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Mecholatithe. Why just these? R. Huna said: "They were passed by the Holy ark. Whomever the holy ark received was to die, and whomever the holy ark did not receive was to live." R. Huna b. Ketina raised the following objection (Ib., ib., 7) But the king had pity on Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul. [Hence it was decided by David and not by the Holy ark?] This means that David did not pass him by [before the Holy ark.] Can there then be favoritism used in such a case? We must therefore explain the above that Mephibosheth was led by the Holy ark and was also receieved, but David prayed and he was relieved. But again the question remained: Can there then be favoritism used in such a case? You must therefore explain it that David prayed that the ark should not receive him [and thus he had mercy.]